Bibliometrics for Library and Information Science Research of Policy Document: Insights from Dimension Database
Item
Dublin Core
Title
Bibliometrics for Library and Information Science Research of Policy Document: Insights from Dimension Database
Subject
Library science
Description
In the identified LIS fields Human Society and Law and Legal Studies have led to higher proportions of documentation and this coverage has rapidly increased since the turn of the 21st century. On the other hand, fields like Mathematical Sciences, Psychology, Physical and Chemical Sciences have remarkably less documents published indicating lack of research attention. Although Engineering and Biological Sciences have always produced a high volume of research, they lag behind Commerce, Management and Biomedical Sciences, in writing policy. While matches in Health Sciences, Information and Computing Sciences and Library and Information Studies increase steadily and slowly, contributing to consistency compared with spikes in other fields, it signals further the increased prioritizing of disciplines specifically related to social situation and jurisprudence. At the same time, Environmental Sciences and Economics have modest growth, but are far from the explosive growth of other fields. The findings from this research emphasize the need for a more evenly balanced focus on fields that are less represented, as well as highlighting trends that reveal larger societal, technological and academic currents affecting research focus worldwide as captured in the Dimension Database.
Creator
Ahmed, Merina
Publisher
RGU Journal of social science and research
Date
2025-10-0
Rights
open access
Relation
3049 3366
Language
English
Type
Article
Identifier
https://doi.org/10.3254/rgujssr.v1i3.75
VRA Core
Work Attributes
Title
Bibliometrics for Library and Information Science Research of Policy Document: Insights from Dimension Database
Date
2025-10-01
Description
In the identified LIS fields Human Society and Law and Legal Studies have led to higher proportions of documentation and this coverage has rapidly increased since the turn of the 21st century. On the other hand, fields like Mathematical Sciences, Psychology, Physical and Chemical Sciences have remarkably less documents published indicating lack of research attention. Although Engineering and Biological Sciences have always produced a high volume of research, they lag behind Commerce, Management and Biomedical Sciences, in writing policy. While matches in Health Sciences, Information and Computing Sciences and Library and Information Studies increase steadily and slowly, contributing to consistency compared with spikes in other fields, it signals further the increased prioritizing of disciplines specifically related to social situation and jurisprudence. At the same time, Environmental Sciences and Economics have modest growth, but are far from the explosive growth of other fields. The findings from this research emphasize the need for a more evenly balanced focus on fields that are less represented, as well as highlighting trends that reveal larger societal, technological and academic currents affecting research focus worldwide as captured in the Dimension Database.
Location
Assam
- @dataDate 2026-01-28 10:02:34
Relation
3049 3366
Subject
Library science
- @dataDate 2026-01-28 10:02:34
Collection
Citation
Ahmed, Merina , “Bibliometrics for Library and Information Science Research of Policy Document: Insights from Dimension Database,” Newme Digital Library, accessed September 9, 2026, https://www.newme-omeka.rguclass.com/items/show/2.
