Skip to main content
Newme Digital Library

Bibliometrics for Library and Information Science Research of Policy Document: Insights from Dimension Database

Item

Dublin Core

Title

Bibliometrics for Library and Information Science Research of Policy Document: Insights from Dimension Database

Subject

Library science

Description

In the identified LIS fields Human Society and Law and Legal Studies have led to higher proportions of documentation and this coverage has rapidly increased since the turn of the 21st century. On the other hand, fields like Mathematical Sciences, Psychology, Physical and Chemical Sciences have remarkably less documents published indicating lack of research attention. Although Engineering and Biological Sciences have always produced a high volume of research, they lag behind Commerce, Management and Biomedical Sciences, in writing policy. While matches in Health Sciences, Information and Computing Sciences and Library and Information Studies increase steadily and slowly, contributing to consistency compared with spikes in other fields, it signals further the increased prioritizing of disciplines specifically related to social situation and jurisprudence. At the same time, Environmental Sciences and Economics have modest growth, but are far from the explosive growth of other fields. The findings from this research emphasize the need for a more evenly balanced focus on fields that are less represented, as well as highlighting trends that reveal larger societal, technological and academic currents affecting research focus worldwide as captured in the Dimension Database.

Creator

Ahmed, Merina

Publisher

RGU Journal of social science and research

Date

2025-10-0

Rights

open access

Relation

3049 3366

Language

English

Type

Article

Identifier

https://doi.org/10.3254/rgujssr.v1i3.75

VRA Core

Work Attributes

Title

Bibliometrics for Library and Information Science Research of Policy Document: Insights from Dimension Database

Date

2025-10-01

Description

In the identified LIS fields Human Society and Law and Legal Studies have led to higher proportions of documentation and this coverage has rapidly increased since the turn of the 21st century. On the other hand, fields like Mathematical Sciences, Psychology, Physical and Chemical Sciences have remarkably less documents published indicating lack of research attention. Although Engineering and Biological Sciences have always produced a high volume of research, they lag behind Commerce, Management and Biomedical Sciences, in writing policy. While matches in Health Sciences, Information and Computing Sciences and Library and Information Studies increase steadily and slowly, contributing to consistency compared with spikes in other fields, it signals further the increased prioritizing of disciplines specifically related to social situation and jurisprudence. At the same time, Environmental Sciences and Economics have modest growth, but are far from the explosive growth of other fields. The findings from this research emphasize the need for a more evenly balanced focus on fields that are less represented, as well as highlighting trends that reveal larger societal, technological and academic currents affecting research focus worldwide as captured in the Dimension Database.

Location

Assam
  • @dataDate 2026-01-28 10:02:32

Relation

3049 3366

Subject

Library science
  • @dataDate 2026-01-28 10:02:32

Collection

Citation

Ahmed, Merina , “Bibliometrics for Library and Information Science Research of Policy Document: Insights from Dimension Database,” Newme Digital Library, accessed September 9, 2026, https://www.newme-omeka.rguclass.com/items/show/1.

Geolocation